New Version 1.18

Information about latest Revision level of the software
and current Download Links.
User avatar
Mooselake
Site Admin
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:21 pm
Location: Mooselake Manor

Re: New Version 1.18

Post by Mooselake »

ArtF wrote: Kirk:

>>What about an option for a rectangul ar (conventio nal metal) or semicircu lar (round 3D printer filament) seal recess on the apex?

 Apex of what? Not sure I understand the question?
Rotor tip?  Where the spinny part rubs against the blower housing.  Not really sure what the correct terminology is, Google hasn't helped much.

Or would tip (?)  seals not survive against the concave area on the opposing lobe?

Kirk
Last edited by Mooselake on Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
ArtF
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 4557
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:14 pm
Contact:

Re: New Version 1.18

Post by ArtF »

Kirk:

  Ahh, I see..Sorry I was thinking of the casing. ( You right click the blower in the tree to build a casing..)

In most cases a seal isnt necessary, in fact its very typical to have a relief instead to stop lockup, many makers
professionally make a small tube in the case from the center of the case ( left and right) to the low pressure side
to allow flow to "slip" by when the pressure peaks in the rotation. Generally though the slippage is considered
to be a small percentage of the total volume being moved. It IS possible of course to make a seal on the rotors
apex to  make it tighter , but I left that up to the user as it seems making a small slit ( or alteratively a small
tube to allow more slippage) is defined more by the roots usage than by its intrinsic design.
  Take note that a roots blower does not in any way drive its mate, in fact it always rubs its mate ( the wrong way.. :) )
so adding a seal also increases the power necessary to turn it and would wear on that spot. To me the best roots
blower implementation ( mathematically) has enough clearance so that when expanded by maximum heat it has
zero clearance to its mate. But since thats hard to figure there really should be just an allowance for looseness
with the understanding that speed vs slip will result in a bit of loss that can be computed in its operational spec.

( But I could easily be wrong, Ive never used one I just studied them a bit to implement them, so as always
we "book experts" can be found wrong anytime by experienced field users. :-) )

Art

Amazon [Bot]
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2026 4:56 pm

Re: New Version 1.18

Post by Amazon [Bot] »

Eaton's design; screws the compressed pulse out a rear opening.
Used two 53 tooth ground straight spur gears that were held and rotated to set the backlash then pressed onto the held timed set of tri lobed Aluminum hobbed  machined shaped rotors. Was involved in the division startup (25 years ago) which also included the development & implementation testing of the assembled units using vibration analysis.
Every unit went through the same pass/fail test cycle checking Boost, Temp, third and fifty third vibration signatures as the most critical information.  As the temp increased, boost increases due to lobe clearance reducing. So gear & lobe timing and sizes are critical. Coatings on the rotors were developed to help with rotor galling as when these thing meet at high heat and high speeds they create quite an abrupt halt.  :'(
ArtF
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 4557
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:14 pm
Contact:

Re: New Version 1.18

Post by ArtF »

LOL..there you go, I knew someone around here would have some expertise. (One reason I never even try to pretend to know..:) )

In the end, I suspect each person will detail a roots to their own usage , if you really want to use such a thing in a turbo system,
then youd have to be real picky about such things as balance and expansion, if you just want to circulate water to your laser, then
their probably good as is. As in all things in GT, Ill allow the user to refine them to usage spec. :)

Thx for that info, interesting..
Art
Post Reply