Page 3 of 3
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:49 pm
by ArtF
Hey John...
If it IS 35watt, its good for anything our 50's will do generally. But Im thinking its more like 10-15 watts, so its good for engraving,
or cutting rubber/paper ..that type of thing..
Art
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:55 pm
by Google Feedfetcher
OK Thanks.
Was hoping for 10mm steel plate.................sigh............
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:30 am
by ArtF
lol....
Start looking fer that YAG laser..
Art
Digital Machinist.
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 4:30 pm
by ArtF
Hi All:
I just recieved a copy of Digital Machinist magazine for Winter and wanted to thank Dan Mauch,
both for sending me the magazine and for the excellent article inside. Its always a pleasure to see others work
from Gearotic, and in a magazine it better still. Thanks Dan for all the work and for documenting it
so well for others. I bow in your general direction,sir.
Art
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 4:36 pm
by Google Feedfetcher
Mine just dropped thru the door today in the UK but not had a chance to read it yet.
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 2:24 pm
by Mooselake
Today's project was to try 3D printing a simple Graham escapement (yeah, I know, go reprint the roots first...). While it hasn't gotten that far yet I found some typos. In the Ratchet Params section Ratchet Depth is misspelled. Pallet shaft diam(s) also has pallet misspelled. Escapements is misspelled one the Lever Escapements tab.
The splash screen has entered a time warp, and says copyright 2013. I'd like to join it and gain a couple years, but it's more realistic to suggest changing it to 2015.
Maybe I'll try the stl slicing and see how it compares to slic3r; at least you spelled slice right.
Congrats on the magazine article. Hope you sell thousands of copies of Gearotic. Tabs alone should sell a hundred<ducks>.
Kirk
Re: Digital Machinist.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:04 pm
by SEOSearch [Crawler]
Delighted that you were happy with the article. The article was written around ver 2.0 and wow! You have added so much more to it that I think I will do another article using it. The only disappointment was they didn't publish the picture of the finished gears. You'd have to see the video link in the article. Hopefully, the article will generate many sales for you.
No, every time I use Mach 3 or Gearotic I turn to the Northeast and bow to you and your superb programming skills. Many thousands of us are the beneficiaries of your great works.
Thank you
Dan Mauch
ArtF wrote:
Hi All:
I just recieved a copy of Digital Machinist magazine for Winter and wanted to thank Dan Mauch,
both for sending me the magazine and for the excellent article inside. Its always a pleasure to see others work
from Gearotic, and in a magazine it better still. Thanks Dan for all the work and for documenting it
so well for others. I bow in your general direction,sir.
Art
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 4:27 pm
by ArtF
Kirk:
Thanks, fixed for next release. One of my many weaknesses is spelling, not that I dont
know better, but I never check my typing. Once entered they dont stick out to me either..
so thx for pointing them out.
Art
Re: Version 2.269 online
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 7:14 pm
by Mooselake
Spelling's not my best area, but I've got the firefox spellchecker turned on...
Back in a past life I had to do a lot of technical proofreading, and errors still jump out. Submit a lot of typos to Amazon via the Kindle, even though nobody seems to do anything with them.
Glad to make a small contribution, and thanks for the undeserved mention in the program credits that I just noticed.
Kirk